Has there ever been a more popular turbo than the T3/T4(T04E) hybrid ? Show it to me. Figure it out
Yet you cant understand the simple sizing format?? T4 cold side mated to T3 hot ?
T3 turbine a/r ratios; extremely common 0.48 or 0.63, or the rare 0.36 or 0.82 if you were at either end of the spectrum
turbine wheel; either standard T3, stage II or stage III
T04E compressor wheels; 46 trim, the ever popular 50 trim, then the 54, 57 & 60.... and the old dog 60-1(T04B) for low boost
These have been in service for eons, and are NO more difficult to grasp than your 'simple mitsu nomenclature'. Perhaps for YOU
Only a dummy could not size a t3/t4 perfectly to their needs
12A, 13B, 14B, 14G, 15T, 16T, 16G, Big 16G, evoIII 16G, 17C, 17T, 18G, 19C, 19T, 20G, 25G, td04, 05, 05h, 06, 06h, 06SL2, 6cm, 7cm, 8cm, 10cm, etc.... than add the proven practice of 10,15 or 23 degree turbine wheel clips. Simpler eh ??
Yes you can interpret things from successful builds but you have to know what their setup was.
That is why I say(and recommend) 'study' them
Just because one Garrett setup didn't work as well doesn't mean another won't. The difference is that you can look at all the information on the Garrett and use that information to decide what needs to change. Now I guess if you are going to pay people to build your turbos and don't care what is going into your car and want to just trust that they will get it right but personally I want to know exactly what is going into my car so if I think it could do better I know what I'm starting with.
Its not like that turboforder didn't care. Evergreen has vast 2.3 experience and knows what makes em tick. The results say it all. Bury your head in maps for hours, and try to match that approach. Good luck
No different than Performance Techinques CT26 upgrades for the 7M bunch, or Precision was to the Buick GN camp, Forced was to the DSM etc.. No compressor maps have their wealth of experience and real world feedback