The only 4A 'build' I've done was nothing more than having a bluetop crank turned 010/010(or .25/.25). Left the bores untouched since ther was no wear ridge. Also took a chance with the oe rods, as the bearings were barely showing copper. Put it back together, new gasket.... ran flawless and lasted years.
I'd keep a tab on total rebuild costs, and only refresh what was needed
oldeskewltoy sweated the detais, concentrating on breathing and probably is as good as n.a street 16V will get imo.
Lots have posted their 16V camshaft feedback. Seach it, especially the old forums..... hachiroku.net too.
Try to score a ride in a cammed up 16V and see if that is what you desire in a daily. Most I've seen were too noisy for my tastes
Likely true but with one you end up with a rebuilt motor and the other you are installing a 20-30 year old motor with unknown miles, unknown condition
Yup, but that's the case with any swap. The vast majority work out, hence why swaps are so popular, still.
Heck, my last stock SR5 will get a 1988 uk starion 2.0L sohc - lol. My favourite motor
with a supercharger that can't be rebuilt and is about as efficient as a blacksmiths bellows.
You can always get a M62 from the junkyard, or go M90 one time
Why whine about SC12(roots) efficiency? Provides EXCELLENT performance for what it is;
Makes the 1.6 drive like a much bigger displacement motor, with instant torque. Is increased tq a bad thing nowadays ?
Enthusiatic GZE guys got their street SC12 cars down to 14.0-13.7sec 1/4s. Freakin amazing in my book!
Furthermore, look at what M90 done on miatas (or even 3.8L buicks, for that matter)
What other $150 used item, will
drive and perfom like that ?